• Home
  • South Dakota Lemon Law Attorney

South Dakota Lemon Law Lawyers and Attorneys

Whether intentionally or unintentionally, lemons are sold more often than we recognize in the United States. For this reason, many states have set up a Lemon Law in order to protect citizens from getting stuck in unfair situations.

Does South Dakota Have a Lemon Law?

As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the need for Lemon Law is great, therefore most states have Lemon Law attorneys available for hire. If you are curious about the specific details of South Dakota’s Lemon Law, there is an abundance of information online on the topic.

What is Lemon Law in South Dakota?

South Dakota Codified Laws, §§ 32-6D-1 to 11

32-6D-1 Definitions.

Terms used in this chapter mean:

“Consumer,” the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a new or previously untitled motor vehicle used in substantial part for personal, family, or household purposes, and any other person entitled by the terms of such warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty;

“Express warranty,” a written warranty, so labeled, issued by the manufacturer of a new motor vehicle, including any terms or conditions precedent to the enforcement of obligations under that warranty;

“Lemon law rights period,” the period ending one year after the date of the original delivery of a motor vehicle to a consumer or the first twelve thousand miles of operation, whichever first occurs;

“Manufacturer,” the person, firm, or corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing, importing, or distributing motor vehicles to be made available to a motor vehicle dealer for retail sale;

“Motor vehicle,” every vehicle intended primarily for use and operation on the public highways which is self-propelled. The term does not apply to any motor home or to any motor vehicle having a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of ten thousand pounds or more;

“Motor vehicle dealer” or “authorized dealer,” any person operating under a dealer agreement from a manufacturer and licensed pursuant to chapter 32-6B;

“Nonconforming condition,” any condition of a motor vehicle which is not in conformity with the terms of any express warranty issued by the manufacturer to a consumer and which significantly impairs the use, value, or safety of the motor vehicle and occurs or arises solely in the course of the ordinary use of the motor vehicle, and which does not arise or occur as a result of abuse, neglect, modification, or alteration of the motor vehicle not authorized by the manufacturer, nor from any accident or other damage to the motor vehicle which occurs or arises after the motor vehicle was delivered by an authorized dealer to the consumer;

“Notice of a nonconforming condition,” a written statement delivered to the manufacturer and which describes the motor vehicle, the nonconforming condition, and all previous attempts to correct such nonconforming condition by identifying the person who made the attempt and the time the attempt was made.

32-6D-2 Notice of nonconforming condition.

Timeliness — Obligation to repair.

If a new motor vehicle does not conform to any applicable express warranty and the consumer delivers the motor vehicle to the manufacturer or its authorized dealer and gives notice of the nonconforming condition during the lemon law rights period, the manufacturer of the motor vehicle shall make the necessary repairs to the motor vehicle to remedy any such onconforming condition. The repairs are required even after the expiration of the lemon law rights period if notice of the nonconforming condition was first given during the lemon law rights period. However, the manufacturer’s obligation to repair the nonconforming condition does not extend beyond the period of twenty-four months following delivery of the vehicle or twenty-four thousand miles, whichever occurs first.

32-6D-3 Replacement of un-repairable vehicle — Refund.

If, after reasonable attempts, the manufacturer or its authorized dealer is unable to conform the motor vehicle to any express warranty by repairing or correcting a nonconforming condition of the motor vehicle which first occurred during the lemon law rights period, the manufacturer shall, at the option of the consumer, replace the motor vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle or shall accept return of the vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the following:

The full contract price including charges for undercoating, dealer preparation, and transportation charges, and installed options, plus the nonrefundable portions of extended warranties and service contracts;

All collateral charges, including excise tax, license, and registration fees and similar government charges;

All finance charges incurred by the consumer after he first reported the nonconformity to the manufacturer or its authorized dealer; and

Any incidental damages which shall include the reasonable cost of alternative transportation during the period that the consumer is without the use of the motor vehicle because of the nonconforming condition.

32-6D-4 Allowance for use of vehicle offset against monetary recovery.

Refunds shall be made to the consumer and any lien holders, as their interests may appear. There shall be offset against any monetary recovery of the consumer a reasonable allowance for the consumer’s use of the vehicle. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount directly attributable to use by the consumer before his first report of the nonconformity to the manufacturer or authorized dealer and shall be calculated by multiplying the full purchase price of the motor vehicle by a fraction having as its denominator one hundred thousand and having as its numerator the number of miles that the vehicle traveled before the first report of nonconformity.

32-6D-5 Reasonable attempts to correct nonconforming condition.

It is presumed that reasonable attempts to correct a nonconforming condition have been allowed by the consumer if, during the period of twenty-four months following delivery of the vehicle or twenty-four thousand miles, whichever first occurs, either of the following events occurred:

The same nonconforming condition was subject to repair attempts four or more times by the manufacturer, or its authorized dealers, at least one of which occurred during the lemon law rights period, plus a final attempt by the manufacturer, and the same nonconforming condition continues to exist; or

The motor vehicle was out of service and in the custody of the manufacturer or an authorized dealer due to repair attempts including the final repair attempt, one of which occurred during the lemon law rights period, for a cumulative total of thirty calendar days, unless the repair could not be performed because of conditions beyond the control of the manufacturer or authorized dealers, such as war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or other natural disaster.

32-6D-6 Civil action against manufacturer.

A consumer sustaining damages as a proximate consequence of the failure by a manufacturer to perform its obligations imposed under this chapter may bring a civil action against the manufacturer to enforce the provisions of this chapter. Prior to the commencement of any such proceeding a consumer shall give notice of a nonconforming condition by certified mail to the manufacturer and demand correction or repair of the nonconforming condition. If at the time the notice of a nonconforming condition is given to the manufacturer, a presumption has arisen that reasonable attempts to correct a nonconforming condition have been allowed, the manufacturer shall be given a final opportunity to cure the nonconforming condition. The manufacturer shall within seven calendar days of receiving the written notice of nonconforming condition notify the consumer of a reasonably accessible repair facility. After delivery of the new vehicle to the authorized repair facility by the consumer, the manufacturer shall attempt to correct the nonconforming condition and conform the vehicle to the express warranty within a period not to exceed fourteen calendar days. If a manufacturer has established an informal dispute settlement procedure conducted within the state which is in compliance with federal rules and regulations, a consumer shall first exhaust any remedy afforded to the consumer under the informal dispute procedure of the manufacturer before a cause of action may be instituted under the provisions of this chapter.

32-6D-7 Affirmative defenses to claim against manufacturer.

It is an affirmative defense to any claim against the manufacturer under this chapter that:

An alleged nonconforming condition does not significantly impair the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle; or

A nonconforming condition is a result of abuse, neglect, or any modification or alteration of a motor vehicle by a consumer that is not authorized by the manufacturer.

32-6D-8 Attorney fees.

If the manufacturer has breached its obligations imposed under this chapter, the consumer may recover, in addition to the remedy provided under 32-6D-2 to 32-6D-5, inclusive, an additional award for reasonable attorney fees.

32-6D-9 Resale of returned vehicle.

If a motor vehicle has been returned to the manufacturer under the provisions of this chapter or a similar statute of another state, whether as the result of a legal action or as the result of an informal dispute settlement proceeding, it may not be resold in this state unless:

The manufacturer discloses in writing to the subsequent purchaser the fact that the motor vehicle was returned under the provisions of this chapter and the nature of the nonconformity to the vehicle warranty; and

The manufacturer returns the title of the motor vehicle to the Department of Revenue advising of the return of the motor vehicle under provisions of this chapter with an application for title in the name of the manufacturer. The department shall brand the title issued to the manufacturer and all subsequent titles to the motor vehicle with the following statement: “This vehicle was returned to the manufacturer because it did not conform to its warranty.

32-6D-10 Liability of dealer.

Nothing in this chapter imposes any liability upon a motor vehicle dealer or authorized dealer or creates a cause of action by a consumer against a motor vehicle dealer or authorized dealer. No manufacturer may charge back or require reimbursement by a motor vehicle dealer or authorized dealer for any costs, including any refunds or vehicle replacements, incurred by the manufacturer arising out of this chapter.

32-6D-11 Time limit for action.

Any action brought under this chapter against the manufacturer shall be commenced within three years following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer.

When does a vehicle qualify as a Lemon in South Dakota?

Because each state has very different lemon qualifications, it can get confusing to know for sure whether you have purchased a vehicle that will qualify. If, after doing some research, you find yourself unsure about the qualifications, our attorneys are available to talk with you and help you make that determination. In fact, our team of legal experts have been working on lemon law cases involving auto manufacturing companies, so we are intimately familiar with how the Lemon Law will be applied to your particular case.

The best way to reach our Lemon Law attorneys is through the easy to complete contact form on our website. After you have filled that out and submitted it, someone from our office will contact you as soon as possible. Otherwise, you can feel free to contact our excellent team of Lemon Law specialists through the telephone at (888)353-0456.

Is a used car covered under South Dakota Lemon Law?

Used cars are expected to come with some issues, and therefore do not usually come with a warranty. Due to the lack of warrantee, it is very difficult to prove that a used car is a lemon. Typically, only new cars will qualify. However, there are instances in which a used car does come with a warranty. If you have found yourself in that situation, you may have a used lemon on your hands.

When do I need a South Dakota based Lemon Law Attorney?

South Dakota based Lemon Law attorneys can be helpful during any phase of the legal process: from the very beginning steps to the end of the case. If you need someone to talk you through the qualifications, we are there. If you need someone to advocate for you in court, we can do that too. Lemon Law attorneys are helpful at any point.

How do Lemon Law Attorneys in South Dakota protect my rights?

Lemon Law attorneys know the Lemon Legal system very thoroughly. Because of this, they have the ability to inform you of and protect your legal rights. If you do not have a knowledgeable professional on your side, you may get cheated out of something that is rightfully yours.

Our attorneys are also informed of the differences between each Lemon Law case. Being knowledgeable about each case’s uniqueness equips them to find the best approach for your particular case.

How long do Lemon Law cases in South Dakota typically take to get resolved?

It is almost impossible to be able to predict the time frame of a Lemon Law case because each situation requires a different level of time and attention. After you have had an initial consultation with one of our attorneys and talked through the ins and outs of your particular case, you will walk away with a better understanding of the time.

Some South Dakota Lemon Law cases can take up to several months to conclude, depending on the complications of the case. No matter the time frame of your case, our attorneys will be there to communicate with you and inform you of what is happening each step of the way.

How much will an South Dakota Lemon Attorney cost to hire?

Fortunately, Lemon Law financial responsibility in South Dakota does not fall on the plaintiff. The auto manufacturer involved in the case is responsible for paying all legal fees, whether or not you come out successful.

What are some of the areas that that Lemon Law Lawyers in South Dakota cover?

If you are ready to speak with or hire one of our experienced, South Dakota Lemon Law attorneys, reach out to us in any of the following major cities:

  • Sioux Falls
  • Rapid City
  • Aberdeen
  • Brookings
  • Watertown
  • Mitchell
  • Yankton
  • Pierre
  • Huron
  • Vermillion
  • Spearfish
  • Brandon
  • Box Elder
  • Sturgis
  • Madison
  • Belle Fourche
  • Harrisburg
  • Tea
  • Hot Springs
  • Dell Rapids
  • Mobridge
  • Milbank
  • Lead
  • Canton
  • Winner
  • Hartford
  • North Sioux City
  • Sisseton
  • Chamberlain
  • Flandreau
  • Redfield
  • Lennox
  • Fort Pierre
  • Custer
  • Beresford
  • Springfield
  • Elk Point
  • Webster
  • Summerset
  • Volga

There is no need to try and navigate the Lemon Law on your own. Our attorneys come equipped with the knowledge and experience necessary to help you get the best outcome from your unfortunate purchase.

Explore Your Rights With Our Expert Team or Contact Us Now At (888) 415-0610