If you bought a car in the United States and it has only brought on more expenses and frustration, it just might be a lemon. You may find legal aid with all the issues associate with your lemon by using lemon law legislature in Montana to your advantage.

Does Montana Have a Lemon Law?

In the United States, many states actually have Lemon Law statutes created specifically to make sure that new automobile purchasers don’t have to suffer the consequences of subpar manufacturing and an unfit or even unsafe car or truck. Your best bet is to do some research on Montana Lemon Law to be sure that the problems you’re having with your car fit under the parameters of Montana Lemon Law.

What is Lemon Law in Montana?

Montana Code Annotated, 61-4-501 to 61-4-526

61-4-501. Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the following definitions apply:

“Collateral charge” means all governmental charges, including but not limited to sales tax, property tax, license and registration fees, and fees in lieu of tax.

“Consumer” means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle that has not been brought into nonconformity as the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations by the purchaser, any person to whom the motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle, or any other person entitled by the terms of the warranty to the benefits of its provisions.

“Incidental damage” means incidental and consequential damage as defined in 30-2-715.

“Manufacturer” has the meaning applied to that word in 61-4-201.

“Motor vehicle” means a vehicle, including the nonresidential portion of a motor home as defined in 61-1-130, propelled by its own power, designed primarily to transport persons or property upon the public highways, and sold in this state. The term does not include a truck with 10,000 pounds or more gross vehicle weight rating or a motorcycle as defined in 61-1-105. Motor vehicle does not include components, systems, fixtures, appliances, furnishings, accessories, and features that are designed, used, and maintained primarily for residential purposes.

“Reasonable allowance for use” is an amount directly attributable to use of the motor vehicle by the consumer and any previous consumers prior to the first written notice of the nonconformity to the manufacturer or its agent and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service because of nonconformity. The reasonable allowance for use shall be computed by multiplying the total contract price of the vehicle by a fraction having as its denominator 100,000 and having as its numerator the number of miles that the vehicle traveled prior to the manufacturer’s acceptance of its return.

“Warranty period” means the period ending 2 years after the date of the original delivery to the consumer of a new motor vehicle or during the first 18,000 miles of operation, whichever is earlier.

61-4-502. Notice — warranty enforceable after warranty period

If a consumer notifies in writing the manufacturer or its agent during the warranty period that a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, the repairs necessary to conform the new motor vehicle to the express warranties shall be made by or at the expense of the warrantor, regardless of the expiration of the warranty period after notification of nonconformity is given by the consumer.

The warranty period of an express warranty is extended to equal the time that repair services are not available because of war or invasion or because of strike or fire, flood, or other natural disaster. The presumption provided herein may not apply against a manufacturer who has not received prior written notification from or on behalf of the consumer and has not had an opportunity to cure the alleged defect.

The manufacturer must clearly and conspicuously disclose to the consumer in the warranty or owner’s manual that written notification of a nonconformity is required before a consumer may be eligible for a refund or replacement of the vehicle. The manufacturer must include with the warranty or owner’s manual the name and address where the written notification must be sent.

61-4-503. Replacement for nonconformity to warranty.

If after a reasonable number of attempts the manufacturer or its agent or authorized dealer is unable, during the warranty period, to conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition that substantially impairs the use and market value or safety of the motor vehicle to the consumer, the manufacturer shall replace it with a new motor vehicle of the same model and style and of equal value, unless for reasons of lack of availability such replacement is impossible, in which case the manufacturer shall replace it with a vehicle of comparable market value.

As an alternative to replacement, the manufacturer may accept return of the new motor vehicle from the consumer upon refund to him of the full purchase price, plus reasonable collateral charges and incidental damages, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer’s use of the motor vehicle. The refund shall be paid to the consumer and to a lien holder, if any, in proportion to their interests.

61-4-504. Reasonable number of attempts — presumption.

A reasonable number of attempts to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties is presumed to have been made for purposes of 61-4-503(1) if:

the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer or its agent or authorized dealer during the warranty period but the nonconformity continues to exist; or

the vehicle is out of service because of nonconformity for a cumulative total of 30 or more business days during the warranty period after notification of the manufacturer, agent, or dealer.

61-4-505. Dealer exemption — liability to manufacturer.

Nothing in this part imposes any liability on a dealer or creates a cause of action by a consumer against a dealer under 61-4-503.

A dealer is not liable to a manufacturer for any refunds or vehicle replacements in the absence of evidence indicating that repairs made by the dealer were carried out in a manner inconsistent with the manufacturer’s instructions.

61-4-506. Provisions nonexclusive.

The provisions of this part do not limit the rights or remedies available to a consumer under any other law.

All express warranties arising from the sale of a new motor vehicle are subject to the provisions of Title 30, chapter 2, part 3.

It is an affirmative defense to a claim brought under this part that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, market value, or safety of the vehicle or that the nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modification or alteration of a motor vehicle by the consumer.

61-4-507. Exhaustion of remedies under federal law.

The provisions of 61-4-503 are not applicable against a manufacturer who has established an informal dispute settlement procedure certified by the department of commerce to be in substantial compliance with the provisions of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703, as those provisions read on October 1, 1983, unless the consumer has first resorted to that procedure without satisfaction.

61-4-511. Manufacturer’s dispute settlement procedure.

A manufacturer who has established an informal dispute settlement procedure under the provisions of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703 (16 CFR, part 703), as those provisions read on October 1, 1983, shall submit a copy of the procedure to the department of commerce. The department of commerce shall issue a certificate of approval to a manufacturer whose procedure complies in all respects with such federal regulations and subsection (2). The department of commerce shall report to the department of justice all manufacturer’s procedures certified. The department of commerce may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of records, documents, or other evidence necessary to it in an investigation related to the certification of a manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure.

A manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure must afford the consumer or his representative an opportunity to appear and present evidence in Montana at a location reasonably convenient to the consumer and, further, may not include any practices that:
(a) delay a decision in any dispute beyond 60 days after the date on which the consumer initially resorts to the dispute settlement procedure;
(b) delay performance of remedies awarded in a settlement beyond 10 days after a decision, except that a manufacturer may have 30 days following the date of decision to replace a motor vehicle or make refund to the consumer as provided in 61-4-503;
(c) require the consumer to make the vehicle available for inspection by a manufacturer’s representative more than once;
(d) fail to consider in decisions any remedies provided by this part; or
(e) require the consumer to take any action or assume any obligation not specifically authorized under the federal regulations referred to in subsection (1).

61-4-512. Annual audit

A manufacturer establishing an informal dispute resolution procedure shall file with the department of commerce a copy of the annual audit required under Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703 (16 CFR, part 703), as those provisions read on October 1, 1983, along with any additional information the department of commerce may require, including the number of refunds and replacements made by the manufacturer during the period audited.

The department of commerce may, after notice and hearing as provided in Title 2, chapter 4, suspend or revoke the certification of a manufacturer’s informal dispute resolution procedure upon a finding that the procedure is being used to create hardship to consumers. The department of commerce shall notify the department of justice of any revocation or suspension of a certification. The department of justice may consider the revocation or suspension in licensing manufacturers under Title 61, chapter 4, part 2.

61-4-515. Arbitration procedure.

The department of commerce shall provide an independent forum and arbitration procedure for the settlement of disputes between consumers and manufacturers of motor vehicles that do not conform to all applicable warranties under the provisions of this part. The procedure must conform to Title 27, chapter 5. All arbitration shall take place in Montana at a place reasonably convenient to the consumer.

Except as provided in 61-4-520, a consumer owning a motor vehicle that fails to conform to all applicable warranties may bring a grievance before an arbitration panel only if the manufacturer of the motor vehicle has not established an informal dispute settlement procedure which has been certified by the department of commerce under 61-4-511.

61-4-516. Composition of arbitration panel.

An arbitration panel hearing a grievance under this part must consist of three members. one member must be chosen by the consumer, one member must be chosen by the manufacturer, and one member must be chosen by mutual agreement of the parties. The department of commerce may maintain a list of persons willing to serve on panels from which the third member may be chosen.

61-4-517. Implementation of arbitration.

A consumer may initiate a request for arbitration by filing a notice with the department of commerce. The consumer shall file, on a form prescribed by the department of commerce, any information considered relevant to the resolution of the dispute and shall return the form, along with a $50 filing fee, within 5 days after receiving it. The complaint form must offer the consumer the choice of presenting any subsequent testimony orally or in writing, but not both.

The department of commerce shall determine whether the complaint alleges the violation of any applicable warranty under this part. If the department of commerce determines that a complaint does not allege a warranty violation, it must refund the filing fee.

Upon acceptance of a complaint, the department of commerce shall notify the manufacturer of the filing of a request for arbitration and shall obtain from the manufacturer, on a form prescribed by the department of commerce, any information considered relevant to the resolution of the dispute. The manufacturer must return the form within 15 days of receipt, with a filing fee of $250.

Fees collected under this section shall be deposited in a special revenue fund for the use of the department of commerce in administering this part.

The manufacturer’s fee provided in subsection (3) is due only if the department of commerce arbitration procedures are utilized.

61-4-518. Arbitration

The department of commerce shall investigate, gather, and organize all information necessary for a fair and timely decision in each dispute. The department of commerce may, on behalf of the arbitration panel, issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents, papers, and records relevant to the dispute.

If requested by the panel, the department of commerce may forward a copy of all written testimony and documentary evidence to an independent technical expert certified by the national institute of automotive excellence. The expert may review the material and be available to advise and consult with the panel. The expert may sit as a nonvoting member of the panel whenever oral testimony is presented. The department of justice may suggest an expert at the request of the department of commerce.

61-4-519. Action by arbitration panel

The arbitration panel shall, as expeditiously as possible, but not later than 60 days after the department of commerce has accepted a complaint, render a fair decision based on the information gathered and disclose its findings and its reasoning to the parties.

The decision shall provide appropriate remedies, including but not limited to:
(a) repair of the vehicle;
(b) replacement of the vehicle with an identical vehicle or a comparable vehicle acceptable to the consumer;
(c) refund as provided in 61-4-503(2);
(d) any other remedies available under the applicable warranties or 15 U.S.C. 2301 through 2312, as in effect on October 1, 1983; or
(e) reimbursement of expenses and costs to the prevailing party.

The decision shall specify a date for performance and completion of all awarded remedies. The department of commerce shall contact the prevailing party within 10 working days after the date for performance to determine whether performance has occurred. The parties shall act in good faith in abiding by any decision. In addition, if the decision is not accepted, the parties shall follow the provisions of Title 27, chapter 5. If it is determined by the court that the appellant has acted without ood cause in bringing an appeal of an award, the court, in its discretion, may grant to the respondent his costs and reasonable attorney fees.

61-4-520. Nonconforming procedure.

A consumer injured by the operation of any procedure that does not conform with procedures established by a manufacturer pursuant to 61-4-511 and the provisions of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703, as in effect on October 1, 1983, may appeal any decision rendered as the result of such a procedure by requesting arbitration de novo of the dispute by a department of commerce panel. Filing procedures and fees for appeals must be the same as those required in 61-4-515 through 61-4-517. The findings of the manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure are admissible in evidence at the department of commerce arbitration panel hearing and in any civil action arising out of any warranty obligation or matter related to the dispute.

61-4-525. Notice on resale of replaced vehicle.

A motor vehicle which is returned to the manufacturer and which requires replacement or refund may not be sold in the state without a clear and conspicuous written disclosure of the fact that the vehicle was returned. The department of justice may prescribe by rule the form and content of the disclosure statement and a procedure by which the disclosure may be removed upon a determination that the vehicle is no longer defective.

61-4-526. Records of disputes.

The department of commerce shall maintain records of each dispute as it determines, including an index of disputes by brand name and model. The department of commerce shall, at intervals of no more than 6 months, compile and maintain statistics indicating the record of compliance with arbitration decisions and the number of refunds or replacements awarded. A copy of the statistical summary must be filed with the department of justice and must be considered by it in determining the issuance of any manufacturer license required under Title 61, chapter 4, part 2.

When does a vehicle qualify as a Lemon in Montana?

Your best bet for figuring out if your car is legally defined as a lemon is to read through Montana Lemon Law carefully to see what criteria coincides when it comes to applying Lemon Law. If you’ve read through this information and still have questions about whether or not your problems are Lemon Law related, give our amazing team of expert Lemon Law attorneys a call.

Alternately, you can also complete a very quick contact information page to tell us the way you prefer to be contacted. Our phone number to reach an expert attorney directly is (888)353-0456. We’ll help you learn everything that’s important when it comes to Montana Lemon Law and make sure you feel comfortable moving forward with your best next step.

Is a used car covered under Montana Lemon Law?

Used cars and trucks don’t tend to be covered under Montana Lemon Law. On the other hand, if your car was purchased with an official warranty that is still active, it’s possible you’d have some Lemon Law recourse. Also please take a note that over time your state’s Lemon Law can change, so take care to find accurate and updated Lemon Law information to know what protections may be afforded to you in your case.

When do I need a Montana based Lemon Law Attorney?

When you think you might have a solid Lemon Law situation, this is the time to pick up the phone and call a competent Montana Lemon Law legal specialist. Most people aren’t qualified to successfully navigate this sort of legislature without legal support. You’ll need our Montana Lemon Law attorneys to aid you with their confidence and experience in handling cases just like yours. Why not give us a call now so you discuss with a specialist whether you should hire legal help right away. Hiring our team of attorneys is the best choice you can make since we have experience representing auto manufacturing companies. We know how to fight for your rights better than anyone else in the business.

How do Lemon Law Attorneys in Montana protect my rights?

A qualified and properly credentialed Lemon Law expert will keep you informed and will provide you the fair representation that you need. Your lawyer also should explain to you all of the legal rights you have plus how he or she will help you gain access to them. Rest assured that we are fully ready and able to stand with you against the large, greedy and legally equipped car making companies.

Our legal associates not only have complete working knowledge of Montana Lemon Law but they also know how to select the best strategy for your individual needs and circumstances and carry your case through to successful completion. Remember that we’ll provide you with a consultation, at no cost to you, and if we determine that your case won’t be pursuable, we can still help give you some general, helpful pointers.

How long do Lemon Law cases in Montana typically take to get resolved?

Sadly, there is no set timeline for Montana Lemon Law cases, but we’ll surely talk to you about what you might expect.

Our clients always provide us positive feedback on our regular communication with them during the whole process which exceeded their expectations.  We also get great feedback on our efforts to expedite your Montana Lemon Law case whenever it proves possible, but many of these suits are about three months in totality.

How much will a Montana Lemon Attorney cost to hire?

In a true, legal Lemon case, the vehicle manufacturer is solely accountable for paying any associated fees from legal proceedings related to the Lemon Law case.   Even if your case were not won, you would still not be responsible for paying us.

What are some of the areas that that Lemon Law Lawyers in Montana cover?

Ready to hire one of our great lawyers? Call to see where you can find our location nearest to you so we can start helping you right away. We’re glad to provide help with Montana Lemon Law in the areas below as well as plenty of others!

  • Billings
  • Miles City
  • Missoula
  • Kalispell
  • Great Falls
  • Havre
  • Bozeman
  • Helena
  • Whitefish
  • Livingston
  • Laurel
  • Sidney
  • Lewistown
  • Glendive
  • Columbia Falls
  • Hamilton
  • Polson
  • Hardin
  • Dillon
  • Shelby
  • Glasgow
  • Deer Lodge
  • Cutbank
  • Wolfpoint
  • Conrad
  • Libby
  • Ronan
  • Columbus
  • Three Forks
  • Boulder
  • Browning

Don’t torture yourself for one more unnecessary minute with endless repairs and time spent on your new vehicle.  Turn your troubles over to us so we can guide you out of your burdensome lemon and into a car that you will find fully satisfying.  Feel free to also call us just to gain a better understanding of Montana Lemon Law!