Montana Lemon Law Lawyers and Attorneys - Lemon Law Group Partners

If you bought a car in the United States and it has only brought on more expenses and frustration, it just might be a lemon. You may find legal aid with all the issues associate with your lemon by using lemon law legislature in Montana to your advantage.

Does Montana Have a Lemon Law?

In the United States, many states actually have Lemon Law statutes created specifically to make sure that new automobile purchasers don’t have to suffer the consequences of subpar manufacturing and an unfit or even unsafe car or truck. Your best bet is to do some research on Montana Lemon Law to be sure that the problems you’re having with your car fit under the parameters of Montana Lemon Law.

What is Lemon Law in Montana?

Montana Code Annotated, 61-4-501 to 61-4-526

61-4-501. Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the following definitions apply:

(1)
“Collateral charge” means all governmental charges, including but not limited to sales tax, property tax, license and registration fees, and fees in lieu of tax.

(2)
“Consumer” means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle that has not been brought into nonconformity as the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations by the purchaser, any person to whom the motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle, or any other person entitled by the terms of the warranty to the benefits of its provisions.

(3)
“Incidental damage” means incidental and consequential damage as defined in 30-2-715.

(4)
“Manufacturer” has the meaning applied to that word in 61-4-201.

(5)
“Motor vehicle” means a vehicle, including the nonresidential portion of a motor home as defined in 61-1-130, propelled by its own power, designed primarily to transport persons or property upon the public highways, and sold in this state. The term does not include a truck with 10,000 pounds or more gross vehicle weight rating or a motorcycle as defined in 61-1-105. Motor vehicle does not include components, systems, fixtures, appliances, furnishings, accessories, and features that are designed, used, and maintained primarily for residential purposes.

(6)
“Reasonable allowance for use” is an amount directly attributable to use of the motor vehicle by the consumer and any previous consumers prior to the first written notice of the nonconformity to the manufacturer or its agent and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service because of nonconformity. The reasonable allowance for use shall be computed by multiplying the total contract price of the vehicle by a fraction having as its denominator 100,000 and having as its numerator the number of miles that the vehicle traveled prior to the manufacturer’s acceptance of its return.

(7)
“Warranty period” means the period ending 2 years after the date of the original delivery to the consumer of a new motor vehicle or during the first 18,000 miles of operation, whichever is earlier.

61-4-502. Notice — warranty enforceable after warranty period

(1)
If a consumer notifies in writing the manufacturer or its agent during the warranty period that a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, the repairs necessary to conform the new motor vehicle to the express warranties shall be made by or at the expense of the warrantor, regardless of the expiration of the warranty period after notification of nonconformity is given by the consumer.

(2)
The warranty period of an express warranty is extended to equal the time that repair services are not available because of war or invasion or because of strike or fire, flood, or other natural disaster. The presumption provided herein may not apply against a manufacturer who has not received prior written notification from or on behalf of the consumer and has not had an opportunity to cure the alleged defect.

(3)
The manufacturer must clearly and conspicuously disclose to the consumer in the warranty or owner’s manual that written notification of a nonconformity is required before a consumer may be eligible for a refund or replacement of the vehicle. The manufacturer must include with the warranty or owner’s manual the name and address where the written notification must be sent.

61-4-503. Replacement for nonconformity to warranty.

(1)
If after a reasonable number of attempts the manufacturer or its agent or authorized dealer is unable, during the warranty period, to conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition that substantially impairs the use and market value or safety of the motor vehicle to the consumer, the manufacturer shall replace it with a new motor vehicle of the same model and style and of equal value, unless for reasons of lack of availability such replacement is impossible, in which case the manufacturer shall replace it with a vehicle of comparable market value.

(2)
As an alternative to replacement, the manufacturer may accept return of the new motor vehicle from the consumer upon refund to him of the full purchase price, plus reasonable collateral charges and incidental damages, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer’s use of the motor vehicle. The refund shall be paid to the consumer and to a lien holder, if any, in proportion to their interests.

61-4-504. Reasonable number of attempts — presumption.

A reasonable number of attempts to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties is presumed to have been made for purposes of 61-4-503(1) if:

(1)
the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer or its agent or authorized dealer during the warranty period but the nonconformity continues to exist; or

(2)
the vehicle is out of service because of nonconformity for a cumulative total of 30 or more business days during the warranty period after notification of the manufacturer, agent, or dealer.

61-4-505. Dealer exemption — liability to manufacturer.

(1)
Nothing in this part imposes any liability on a dealer or creates a cause of action by a consumer against a dealer under 61-4-503.

(2)
A dealer is not liable to a manufacturer for any refunds or vehicle replacements in the absence of evidence indicating that repairs made by the dealer were carried out in a manner inconsistent with the manufacturer’s instructions.

61-4-506. Provisions nonexclusive.

(1)
The provisions of this part do not limit the rights or remedies available to a consumer under any other law.

(2)
All express warranties arising from the sale of a new motor vehicle are subject to the provisions of Title 30, chapter 2, part 3.

(3)
It is an affirmative defense to a claim brought under this part that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, market value, or safety of the vehicle or that the nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modification or alteration of a motor vehicle by the consumer.

61-4-507. Exhaustion of remedies under federal law.

The provisions of 61-4-503 are not applicable against a manufacturer who has established an informal dispute settlement procedure certified by the department of commerce to be in substantial compliance with the provisions of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703, as those provisions read on October 1, 1983, unless the consumer has first resorted to that procedure without satisfaction.

61-4-511. Manufacturer’s dispute settlement procedure.

(1)
A manufacturer who has established an informal dispute settlement procedure under the provisions of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703 (16 CFR, part 703), as those provisions read on October 1, 1983, shall submit a copy of the procedure to the department of commerce. The department of commerce shall issue a certificate of approval to a manufacturer whose procedure complies in all respects with such federal regulations and subsection (2). The department of commerce shall report to the department of justice all manufacturer’s procedures certified. The department of commerce may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of records, documents, or other evidence necessary to it in an investigation related to the certification of a manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure.

(2)
A manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure must afford the consumer or his representative an opportunity to appear and present evidence in Montana at a location reasonably convenient to the consumer and, further, may not include any practices that:
(a) delay a decision in any dispute beyond 60 days after the date on which the consumer initially resorts to the dispute settlement procedure;
(b) delay performance of remedies awarded in a settlement beyond 10 days after a decision, except that a manufacturer may have 30 days following the date of decision to replace a motor vehicle or make refund to the consumer as provided in 61-4-503;
(c) require the consumer to make the vehicle available for inspection by a manufacturer’s representative more than once;
(d) fail to consider in decisions any remedies provided by this part; or
(e) require the consumer to take any action or assume any obligation not specifically authorized under the federal regulations referred to in subsection (1).

61-4-512. Annual audit

(1)
A manufacturer establishing an informal dispute resolution procedure shall file with the department of commerce a copy of the annual audit required under Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703 (16 CFR, part 703), as those provisions read on October 1, 1983, along with any additional information the department of commerce may require, including the number of refunds and replacements made by the manufacturer during the period audited.

(2)
The department of commerce may, after notice and hearing as provided in Title 2, chapter 4, suspend or revoke the certification of a manufacturer’s informal dispute resolution procedure upon a finding that the procedure is being used to create hardship to consumers. The department of commerce shall notify the department of justice of any revocation or suspension of a certification. The department of justice may consider the revocation or suspension in licensing manufacturers under Title 61, chapter 4, part 2.

61-4-515. Arbitration procedure.

(1)
The department of commerce shall provide an independent forum and arbitration procedure for the settlement of disputes between consumers and manufacturers of motor vehicles that do not conform to all applicable warranties under the provisions of this part. The procedure must conform to Title 27, chapter 5. All arbitration shall take place in Montana at a place reasonably convenient to the consumer.

(2)
Except as provided in 61-4-520, a consumer owning a motor vehicle that fails to conform to all applicable warranties may bring a grievance before an arbitration panel only if the manufacturer of the motor vehicle has not established an informal dispute settlement procedure which has been certified by the department of commerce under 61-4-511.

61-4-516. Composition of arbitration panel.

An arbitration panel hearing a grievance under this part must consist of three members. one member must be chosen by the consumer, one member must be chosen by the manufacturer, and one member must be chosen by mutual agreement of the parties. The department of commerce may maintain a list of persons willing to serve on panels from which the third member may be chosen.

61-4-517. Implementation of arbitration.

(1)
A consumer may initiate a request for arbitration by filing a notice with the department of commerce. The consumer shall file, on a form prescribed by the department of commerce, any information considered relevant to the resolution of the dispute and shall return the form, along with a $50 filing fee, within 5 days after receiving it. The complaint form must offer the consumer the choice of presenting any subsequent testimony orally or in writing, but not both.

(2)
The department of commerce shall determine whether the complaint alleges the violation of any applicable warranty under this part. If the department of commerce determines that a complaint does not allege a warranty violation, it must refund the filing fee.

(3)
Upon acceptance of a complaint, the department of commerce shall notify the manufacturer of the filing of a request for arbitration and shall obtain from the manufacturer, on a form prescribed by the department of commerce, any information considered relevant to the resolution of the dispute. The manufacturer must return the form within 15 days of receipt, with a filing fee of $250.

(4)
Fees collected under this section shall be deposited in a special revenue fund for the use of the department of commerce in administering this part.

(5)
The manufacturer’s fee provided in subsection (3) is due only if the department of commerce arbitration procedures are utilized.

61-4-518. Arbitration

(1)
The department of commerce shall investigate, gather, and organize all information necessary for a fair and timely decision in each dispute. The department of commerce may, on behalf of the arbitration panel, issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents, papers, and records relevant to the dispute.

(2)
If requested by the panel, the department of commerce may forward a copy of all written testimony and documentary evidence to an independent technical expert certified by the national institute of automotive excellence. The expert may review the material and be available to advise and consult with the panel. The expert may sit as a nonvoting member of the panel whenever oral testimony is presented. The department of justice may suggest an expert at the request of the department of commerce.

61-4-519. Action by arbitration panel

(1)
The arbitration panel shall, as expeditiously as possible, but not later than 60 days after the department of commerce has accepted a complaint, render a fair decision based on the information gathered and disclose its findings and its reasoning to the parties.

(2)
The decision shall provide appropriate remedies, including but not limited to:
(a) repair of the vehicle;
(b) replacement of the vehicle with an identical vehicle or a comparable vehicle acceptable to the consumer;
(c) refund as provided in 61-4-503(2);
(d) any other remedies available under the applicable warranties or 15 U.S.C. 2301 through 2312, as in effect on October 1, 1983; or
(e) reimbursement of expenses and costs to the prevailing party.

(3)
The decision shall specify a date for performance and completion of all awarded remedies. The department of commerce shall contact the prevailing party within 10 working days after the date for performance to determine whether performance has occurred. The parties shall act in good faith in abiding by any decision. In addition, if the decision is not accepted, the parties shall follow the provisions of Title 27, chapter 5. If it is determined by the court that the appellant has acted without ood cause in bringing an appeal of an award, the court, in its discretion, may grant to the respondent his costs and reasonable attorney fees.

61-4-520. Nonconforming procedure.

A consumer injured by the operation of any procedure that does not conform with procedures established by a manufacturer pursuant to 61-4-511 and the provisions of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703, as in effect on October 1, 1983, may appeal any decision rendered as the result of such a procedure by requesting arbitration de novo of the dispute by a department of commerce panel. Filing procedures and fees for appeals must be the same as those required in 61-4-515 through 61-4-517. The findings of the manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure are admissible in evidence at the department of commerce arbitration panel hearing and in any civil action arising out of any warranty obligation or matter related to the dispute.

61-4-525. Notice on resale of replaced vehicle.

A motor vehicle which is returned to the manufacturer and which requires replacement or refund may not be sold in the state without a clear and conspicuous written disclosure of the fact that the vehicle was returned. The department of justice may prescribe by rule the form and content of the disclosure statement and a procedure by which the disclosure may be removed upon a determination that the vehicle is no longer defective.

61-4-526. Records of disputes.

The department of commerce shall maintain records of each dispute as it determines, including an index of disputes by brand name and model. The department of commerce shall, at intervals of no more than 6 months, compile and maintain statistics indicating the record of compliance with arbitration decisions and the number of refunds or replacements awarded. A copy of the statistical summary must be filed with the department of justice and must be considered by it in determining the issuance of any manufacturer license required under Title 61, chapter 4, part 2.

When does a vehicle qualify as a Lemon in Montana?

Your best bet for figuring out if your car is legally defined as a lemon is to read through Montana Lemon Law carefully to see what criteria coincides when it comes to applying Lemon Law. If you’ve read through this information and still have questions about whether or not your problems are Lemon Law related, give our amazing team of expert Lemon Law attorneys a call.

Alternately, you can also complete a very quick contact information page to tell us the way you prefer to be contacted. Our phone number to reach an expert attorney directly is (888)353-0456. We’ll help you learn everything that’s important when it comes to Montana Lemon Law and make sure you feel comfortable moving forward with your best next step.

Is a used car covered under Montana Lemon Law?

Used cars and trucks don’t tend to be covered under Montana Lemon Law. On the other hand, if your car was purchased with an official warranty that is still active, it’s possible you’d have some Lemon Law recourse. Also please take a note that over time your state’s Lemon Law can change, so take care to find accurate and updated Lemon Law information to know what protections may be afforded to you in your case.

When do I need a Montana based Lemon Law Attorney?

When you think you might have a solid Lemon Law situation, this is the time to pick up the phone and call a competent Montana Lemon Law legal specialist. Most people aren’t qualified to successfully navigate this sort of legislature without legal support. You’ll need our Montana Lemon Law attorneys to aid you with their confidence and experience in handling cases just like yours. Why not give us a call now so you discuss with a specialist whether you should hire legal help right away. Hiring our team of attorneys is the best choice you can make since we have experience representing auto manufacturing companies. We know how to fight for your rights better than anyone else in the business.

How do Lemon Law Attorneys in Montana protect my rights?

A qualified and properly credentialed Lemon Law expert will keep you informed and will provide you the fair representation that you need. Your lawyer also should explain to you all of the legal rights you have plus how he or she will help you gain access to them. Rest assured that we are fully ready and able to stand with you against the large, greedy and legally equipped car making companies.

Our legal associates not only have complete working knowledge of Montana Lemon Law but they also know how to select the best strategy for your individual needs and circumstances and carry your case through to successful completion. Remember that we’ll provide you with a consultation, at no cost to you, and if we determine that your case won’t be pursuable, we can still help give you some general, helpful pointers.

How long do Lemon Law cases in Montana typically take to get resolved?

Sadly, there is no set timeline for Montana Lemon Law cases, but we’ll surely talk to you about what you might expect.

Our clients always provide us positive feedback on our regular communication with them during the whole process which exceeded their expectations. We also get great feedback on our efforts to expedite your Montana Lemon Law case whenever it proves possible, but many of these suits are about three months in totality.

How much will a Montana Lemon Attorney cost to hire?

In a true, legal Lemon case, the vehicle manufacturer is solely accountable for paying any associated fees from legal proceedings related to the Lemon Law case. Even if your case were not won, you would still not be responsible for paying us.

What are some of the areas that that Lemon Law Lawyers in Montana cover?

Ready to hire one of our great lawyers? Call to see where you can find our location nearest to you so we can start helping you right away. We’re glad to provide help with Montana Lemon Law in the areas below as well as plenty of others!

Billings
Miles City
Missoula
Kalispell
Great Falls
Havre
Bozeman
Helena
Whitefish
Livingston
Laurel
Sidney
Lewistown
Glendive
Columbia Falls
Hamilton
Polson
Hardin
Dillon
Shelby
Glasgow
Deer Lodge
Cutbank
Wolfpoint
Conrad
Libby
Ronan
Columbus
Three Forks
Boulder
Browning

Don’t torture yourself for one more unnecessary minute with endless repairs and time spent on your new vehicle. Turn your troubles over to us so we can guide you out of your burdensome lemon and into a car that you will find fully satisfying. Feel free to also call us just to gain a better understanding of Montana Lemon Law!

GIVE US A CALL…OUR TEAM IS HERE TO HELP YOU. THE CALL AND CONSULTATION ARE FREE.

Your State Lemon Law

Google Rating

4.4

Lemon Law Group Partners PLC

World’s Lost it’s mind

14:19 07 Jul 23

They helped me get money for something that the dealership and manufacturer could not fix and kept blowing it off like it wasn’t a big deal.but lemon law was very “on it “ with everything and easy to get answers from with good guidance to boot so I would highly recommend them

Jim McConnell

18:05 29 Jun 23

I was referred to this firm by a very good friend who is also an attorney. My experience with them has been more than stellar. Any time I needed to talk with Randy, who was handling my case, if he didn't answer the phone, he called back the same day. The case was handled in a reasonable amount of time and the results were much better than I anticipated. Simply put, I would not hesitate to hire them if the need presented itself. A big thank you to Randy and the Lemon Law Group Partners.

RobCalif

20:20 13 Apr 23

I recently had the pleasure of working with Lemon Law Partners and I am extremely impressed with their level of dedication and expertise in the field of lemon law. They successfully negotiated a settlement for my defective Polaris RZR which had caused me a great deal of frustration and financial loss. The team at Lemon Law Partners was professional and communicated with me every step of the way throughout the entire process. They were able to get me the compensation I deserved in a timely manner and I couldn't be more satisfied with their services. I highly recommend Lemon Law Partners to anyone who is dealing with similar issues and needs a knowledgeable and trustworthy legal team on their side. Thank you, Lemon Law Partners for your hard work and excellent service!

Johnny Macon

19:16 13 Apr 23

Super happy with my results. Relieved my settlement within 3 months. Very professional service and always available to answer any questions you may have. I highly recommend this law firm to anyone who's seeking representation pertaining to your vehicle issues. Two big thumbs up

Jermaine Pow

01:45 27 Jan 23

After a nauseating experience with the dealership and their failure to resolve a reoccurring issue I was informed that lemon law may apply. I went on the internet and did a search, after a few calls I came across the Lemon law group, after a brief discussion of the facts a retainer was sent to me, a case manager (Randy Dunbar) was assigned to my case, thank you Sir for how you oversaw this case. It has been an absolute pleasure working with this team as they are all constant professionals who are great at what they do, great communication all around, diligent in gathering information needed, ensured I was informed of options the entire process. To sum it up, my car was repaired and I received a cash settlement which surpassed what I had expected. I highly recommend this firm for services.

Yuli Neri

20:25 05 Jan 23

I had a great experience with Lemon Law Group Partners. My case manager Mr. Dunbar was thorough and quick to respond to my concerns. I was also given attentive assurance and responses by Mr. Winston (Steve) when I had my concerns about the timeline. The process is lengthy, but the firm lays out the steps in the retainer agreement. Patience is necessary and they will work to give you a favorable outcome.

Michael S. Markle

21:00 21 Dec 22

Maria Hannah was very helpful in my case with my vehicle. She was always responsive and to the point. I am very pleased with the work that she has done and had completed on my case. If there is anyone out there that is working full-time plus hours and you buy a new vehicle with all the perks that you bought with the vehicle, that don't work properly , and your spending time you don't have to be sure those repairs are done, and you want compensated for that time lost, this is the one you need to sign up with. If there are more than 5 stars I could give, she would get them. She is for the client, 100%!!! Thank you Maria Hannah for a job well done!!!!

Olivia Nachmany

01:29 11 Nov 22

We had a great experience with Lemon Law Group. I leased a new car in 2020 and it was nothing but problems. For over two years I tried to work it out directly with the dealership and then with corporate, but with no progress. We contacted Lemon Law Group and once we sent them all of our service records, they took over the process and within a few months we reached a very favorable resolution. Quick, easy, and well worth it.

Ramel Bautista

19:30 07 Sep 22

Can not recommend them enough. After having my first option tell me that I had to wait longer until I could take action, these guys took the same information and took immediate action. The entire process was so easy and they communicated with me quickly and were there to answer all my questions. With patience, I was able to get the settlement for GM to buy back my problematic C8 Corvette, for which I paid the outrageous premium that all consumers are feeling right now. Again, extremely professional group of individuals and I can not recommend them enough if you need experts to win for you.

Kiki Alard

13:23 03 Aug 22

Lemon Law group was great with my case. They helped walk me through the process and made it all easy for me. Loved that they had my best interest in mind even when i wanted a different outcome they explained why it was bot in my best interest to go that route but at the same time did not pressure me to do so. Their communication was excellent and ended up settling my case for more than what i expected in a quick time frame as well. Would highly recommend them to anyone having to face car manufacturing giants. I am very happy with the outcome and their work.

Ken Dessert

16:40 29 Jun 22

Lemon Law Group Partners negotiated a fair settlement with GM on our behalf. Right from the start they were responsive and attentive to our requests. We received quick responses to our emails, texts and phone calls. During the negotiating process our Case Manager offered up varying scenarios to help us make prudent decisions. I recommend them highly.

Bridget C

17:24 13 Apr 22

I highly recommend Lemon Law Group Partners. Not only did they fight hard for me and my case, they did the right thing consistently without me having to advocate for guidance or help. The level of two way communication was fantastic. Camilo deserves 10 stars for consistently going above and beyond with each and every interaction. We were able to reach a settlement of exactly what I initially asked for in a timely manner. If you are frustrated by your situation, call Lemon Law Group - they are OUTSTANDING at what they do.

Peter Templeton

22:48 07 Apr 22

After trouble with my Genesis G70 I reached out to Lemon Law Group for help. Randy was my case manager and did a wonderful job working with me through the whole process. Everyone I spoke too was professional and worked expediently. I cannot say enough good things about my experience with them.

J Tor

16:17 01 Apr 22

Ada was absolutely amazing! She communicated with me and my family every step of the way. Chrysler is a pain in the butt to deal with and LLGP did a great job being an extension of our family to advocate for our issues! Thank you so much. I would recommend them to anyone having an issue with a Lemon

Stan Afichuk

22:41 25 Feb 22

Absolutely amazing experience. Ada Brown has been an absolute blessing throughout my repurchase. Without her help, I would have nothing to show for. But because of her expertise in the lemon law field, I was able to get everything wrapped up within a month of her taking on my case and get more for my troubles than I could have ever imagined. Highly recommend Lemon Law Group Partners PLC and Ada Brown!

SoCal Outdoor Life

05:13 11 Jun 21

LLGP was a great company to work with. They explained the process in detail which made us feel at ease. Any questions we had, would be answered in a timely manner. I highly recommend Lemon Law Group Partners. Thank You! Hannah and Team for all the hard work you’ve guys done for us. It’s was a pleasure! Respectively, - Richard A

Erika Steiner

21:36 27 May 21

This review is for the business only, NOT the result I got. I worked with Maria Hanna and she was very courteous and professional. The five stars are for her. She did her best and I very much appreciate that. Unfortunately the result wasn't what I hoped for, but that's what happens when you try to hold a big car company accountable for the defective vehicles that they sell. I am grateful the Lemon Law Group, just wish more could have been done to resolve the issues with my car (which still isn't fixed). *Sigh*

Curtis Fox

02:27 07 May 21

Main points to consider: 1. Make sure the firm does what they say they’ll do without causing delays for you and your case resolution. 2. Document every encounter with every individual from beginning to end. 3. Make sure to plan accordingly for potential out of pocket fees, as all is not what it seems in the end. Initially I would say this firm is fantastic and an awesome value, however, after it was all said and done I ended up owing them $750 in fees because the manufacture of my defective vehicle put a cap on the amount of attorneys fees they’d pay. I don’t think the burden of paying the difference should have been placed on me because when I did my intake, I was assured that I wouldn’t have to pay a dime, and that all fees would be paid by the manufacture in full. When I reminded them of this, I was threatened with the potential of my case being delayed regarding settlement....as I had already gone through so many obstacles, a delay in resolution was not an option. While the firm did work with me in making arrangements without delaying the process, the fact remains that I still have to pay when I was promised, after inquiring several times about it before hiring them, that I would not pay a cent. Please do your due diligence folks before embarking down this road. Make sure you ask questions, take notes, take names of everyone you’ve talked with throughout the process from beginning to end, and get it in writing that ALL fees will be in fact be covered by the firm going after the manufacture and not leaving the difference in balance to your responsibility should a settlement be reached. Maria Hannah, my case manager, was an absolute pleasure and an amazing individual in assisting me throughout this ordeal; I’m grateful for her diligence in making sure this was settled amicably and quickly. I can’t fault her in any of the discrepancies I encountered, as the decisions regarding fees was beyond her scope of management. Maria was great, the firm needs to do better with communicating potential outcomes and fee responsibilities during the intake process as to better prepare individuals with planning.

Lisa Booley

16:37 30 Mar 21

I would highly recommend this law office to anyone who is looking to file a lemon law claim. Everyone was professional, informative and friendly. I am very satisfied with the outcome of my claim!!!

Coc Fc

17:24 17 Mar 21

I am very pleased with the service I received with lemon law group. They were professional and quickly responded to all my emails. From start to end. Jeff was the initial person to register me , and Maria Hannah was the case manager. The process took a little less than 3 months. They were checking in on me frequently and responded to every email promptly. If you have any problems with a new vehicle, stop wasting your time at the dealership because they will give you the run around . Contact Lemon Law Group and they will work for you. Mine was a cash and keys with a great settlement.

Ben Lo

15:49 16 Mar 21

The Lemon Law Group did a great job take care of my lemon law case. The process went smoothly and was done in 3 months. One thing to keep in mind is that there will be periods of time where there will be no responses/emails and that is to be expected because responses from the carmaker's lawyers take time. If you keep that in mind and not rush the process the less stressful it will be. The Lemon Law Group staff was very responsive to emails and calls as well.

David Kyle

17:30 19 Feb 21

Consummate professionals, and very proactive responsiveness.! I am very pleased on how they handled my case. They ensured I got the best. Everyone that contacted me was very professional and informative about everything going on with my case. I would whole heartily recommend firm. My sincerest gratitude for everything you did for me.

Jonathan E Ruiz lopez

15:15 18 Feb 21

Very professional, and responsive.! great attorneys. I am very pleased on how they handled my case. They made sure I got the best. Everyone that contacted me was very professional and informative about everything going on with my case. I would gladly recommend these guys. Thank you for everything you did for me.

mosca11b

05:59 15 Dec 20

I was so surprised how quickly my case was settled & had the manufacture returned to us every penny we had spent in the car. The Lemon Law Group Partners, provided an outstanding service in keeping us informed on every step taking during the process. A law firm easy to deal with, very honest, caring about the costumer issues! I am giving them 5 stars because they deserve it. I will recommend them 100% to anyone in need of legal representation when dealing with with lemon law. Lemon Law Group Partners rocks! We are very happy with the terms of our legal settlement & once again, I congratulate The Lemon Law Group Partners for a job well done representing us! Oscar

Amber R

17:26 29 Sep 20

I found this firm through Google search. Had an issue with car recently purchased in January 2020 with passenger airbag light. Within first contact I received emails, phone calls and follow up from Ada Brown and her team. They handles my claim and we received a settlement within 2 months from the manufacturer based on the specifics of my case. I would highly recommend using the Lemon Law Group for your lemon car needs.

treymetzger

00:25 11 May 19

Fantastic service. Helped me out of a very poorly designed vehicle and got me a settlement beyond what I was expecting. Very satisfied. I hope I am never in a lemon again, but if I am this firm will be the one to call. Also, a special thanks to Ada Brown for helping and putting up with me! She was very professional and kind to work with. Thanks again LLGP

Rebekah G

15:07 23 Apr 19

I am pleased that my husband and I chose to hire the Lemon Law Group. They were very knowledgeable and courteous. I had a great experience working with Randy, a paralegal. I would highly recommend using their law firm. It took less than a year and we just finished our Arbitration and cannot wait to give our Lemon back to the Honda Dealership. Randy was always very polite and never hesitated to remind me, in a courteous way, as to what was expected and/or needed from me.

Matt Moore

22:57 26 Feb 19

My experience was great throughout the whole process in which Lemon Law Group Partners handled my claim. It started by prompt communication with a phone call after submitting initial contact online. It was very easy to communicate with each person involved during the processing of my claim. I would hope to not need their services again but if I do I know who I will be contacting.

Gwen Sledge

13:49 20 Feb 19

The Lemon Law Group is by far a hardworking group. From my first call for help they treated me as a priority. They answered and responded to my emails and calls in a timely manner. Thank you Randy for making things happen and for your outstanding professional customer first service.

Bob Kulstad

19:31 18 Feb 19

Randy and the team at Lemon Law Group Partners was very thorough, very quick, and very knowledgeable. They were able to get my car repurchased after I got absolutely nowhere with the dealer and the manufacturer. I highly recommend their services!

Kassandra Cendejas

23:48 07 Feb 19

All the lawyers I encountered during my journey, to get Mercedes to acknowledge that my new benz was defective, were great! Communication was rapid. They answered all of my questions and calls! I never felt as if my case did not matter to them. I recommend their service to anyone who is looking for lawyers that actually care and are with you every step of the way!

Stephen Graves

19:43 15 Jan 19

I’ve never gone through the process of buying a new car and having issues. The team was experienced and the process was seamless. Hannah, was a pleasure to communicate with.. she even followed up with my emails while on her honeymoon. Thanks for everything Update: thanks Amy for keeping me posted throughout the process. I realize these cases take time and thanks for keeping the line of communication seamless

India Palacios

19:23 15 Jan 19

Ms. Kathryn Abrams is the most kind and considerate attorney I have ever met. She is sincere and always returned emails and phone calls promptly. She always answered all my questions and concerns to my satisfaction. I will truly recommend the Lemon Law Group to anyone I know that may have issues with a "lemon"!

23:17 09 Jan 19

23:07 09 Jan 19

22:35 09 Jan 19

22:34 09 Jan 19

22:20 09 Jan 19

Terri Norwood

02:55 15 Dec 18

I am pleased with the outcome of my settlement. The staff that assisted me throughout this process was very informative. I would highly refer people to this firm if they feel they have a case that falls under the lemon law.. Good job lemon law group partners, another win for you. 👍👍👏👏

Rex Emerson

20:34 21 Nov 18

I contacted Lemon Law Group, at which time I was not even sure if I had a case. After a brief conversation with an associate at Lemon Law Group, I was assured I had a case which could be pursued. The legal team did all the work and they negotiated a very good settlement, and worked out the repairs, with the manufacturer. It never hurts to make a call, you may have a case which will allow you to get the wrong, corrected.

Brian Miller

22:36 20 Nov 18

They made getting my settlement easy! They took care of all communication with the vehicle company and I didn't have to worry about a thing. They helped me receive the maximum amount even though they got paid the same amount whatever i was offered. They didn't try to convince me to take a lower offer so they could do less work and make the same amount. Very impressed with all the employees I was in contact with. Highly recommend!

John Jassy

18:52 20 Nov 18

My experience has been excellent. I dealt primarily with Randy Dunbar. He was intelligent, professional and always responsive. It appears we have achieved an excellent settlement with Aston Martin.

Ricardo Tapia

23:45 16 Nov 18

Lemon Law Group did a great job with handling my case with Ford. Kathryn Abrams is great at what she does and did not settle for any less than what I deserved. She walked me through the process and explained all scenarios. I had many questions and she took care of business and replied in a timely manner. I hope I do not get any more lemon cars, but if I do, I know who to call. Recommend for sure.

john udell

18:47 08 Nov 18

Hannah and the group were able to successfully get my vehicle re-purchased. I was at the end of my ropes with the dealership, as to see the manufacture. They were able to walk me through the process for a successful outcome. If you are having issues whether or not they fall under The criteria, don’t hesitate… Push that button and make the phone call. You will be happy that you did. Thanks again everybody!

See All Reviews Write a review